PROXMARK3 MIFARE DESFIRE EV1 CLONE HOW TO

The possible consequences of not taking this issue seriously are numerous. In addition, many corporate compliance rules can easily be broken by employees modifying their passes to perform actions such as breaking the banking rules on compulsory holidays, engaging in secure document printing and logging on to unauthorised computer and other IT equipment. For instance, organisations can no longer rely on the transactions on an audit report being acceptable as proof of someone’s activities, as an individual can simply claim it was not them and that their card must have been copied. The internal threat regarding access control should also be considered. It should also remembered that even when biometric devices are used there are hacking tools out there that make these systems equally at risk of attack, unless proper actions are taken. The good news is that companies such as NXP Semiconductors are developing technology to help thwart the hackers, but there are still many organisations with access control systems that feature outdated protocols. However, in order to stay one step ahead of the hackers, the company developed MIFARE DESFire EV1 in 2006 and in 2016 augmented its offering with MIFARE DESFire EV2, both of which, at the time of writing, cannot be hacked.Īlthough some leading access control manufacturers now use MIFARE DESFire EV1, over the next year there will be a move towards MIFARE DESFire EV2, due to it having features that easier key rotation, easier support for other applications on the card and extended read range. With 260 million readers and compliance with ISO/IEC 14443, MIFARE is used in more than 80 per cent of all contactless smart cards today. Once the problem surrounding RFID was recognised, access control manufacturers began to use the MIFARE protocol from NXP Semiconductors. When it comes to RFID, the problem is that Wiegand, the industry standard over the air protocol commonly used to communicate credential data from a card to an electronic access reader, is no longer inherently secure.

PROXMARK3 MIFARE DESFIRE EV1 CLONE HOW TO

In fact, the broader popularity of RFID for use in tags, readers, labels, cards, fobs and all other items shows no sign of waning, with IDTechEx reporting that in 2017 the total market will be worth $11.2bn, up from $10.52bn in 2016.Īlthough it took hackers many years to work out how to infiltrate RFID systems, a cursory search on YouTube throws up numerous videos of individuals cloning readers with apparent ease.

In the earliest days of contactless systems, radio frequency identification (RFID) was the de-facto choice for most manufacturers and many systems with this technology are still in use. Theory of evolutionĪs access control technology has developed over the last 25 years, so too have the protocols used to make it work. Most organisations are simply not aware of just how easy they can have their sensitive data – and the hardware it is stored on – hacked, or that the tools to do it can be purchased online for as little as £20. Often considered the first line of defence against those with malicious intent, there is a growing realisation that many contactless access control systems currently in-situ are vulnerable to those wishing to interfere with information and operational technology (IT/OT) systems. Andrew Fulton, Vanderbilt’s access control product manager, examines the scale of the problem and suggests some of the measures that can be taken to ensure that a building is as secure as possible. PROMOTIONAL ARTICLE Around 90 per cent of all access control cards in use today are easily copied and cloned, with devices that are able to carry out this activity easily available on the internet.

Proxmark3 mifare desfire ev1 clone